I looked at the California DOJ site yesterday, and there is a huge list of recently removed firearms, as of July 7.
Looked like maybe all of Ruger's pistols and Charter's whole catalog, with lots of Walthers, Kimbers, Para, Browning, Taurus, you name it. Are all these makers simply slow to re-certify, or are they simply pulling out of the California market?
California DOJ "safe" list shrinking?
Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators
California DOJ "safe" list shrinking?
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols
Very sad, I have to put a CA disclaimer on my firearms ads because I do not have an FFL who will ship there on my behalf. It bothers me not to be able to support CA gun owners. It is clear that the antigun crowd has decided to use "safety" as another avenue toward ban. Regards
Member Marine Corps League
Life Member National Rifle Association
Life Member Texas State Rifle Association
Life Member National Rifle Association
Life Member Texas State Rifle Association
- bebloomster
- Regular contributor
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:06 pm
- Location: Hi Desert, Ca
Unfortunately our elected representatives in Sacramento do anything other than represent those who voted for them. The "approved" list seems to be just another way to legislate handguns out of existence in Kalifornia. How long will it be before they try the same tactic with long arms? With my single vote I try, but there seems to be little that I can do.
A day without sunshine is like..... night.