No more handgun a month in VA

The place to discuss items of a general nature or items that do not fit into the other categories.

Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

No more handgun a month in VA

Post by ruger22 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:57 am

VA will soon not have a one handgun a month purchase limit. It's repeal has passed the state legislature, just needs the gov's signature, and he has said he'll sign it.

There are a slew of good gun law changes in process, and most seem to have a good chance of passing. Teachers and professors being able to carry on school grounds. No background check on sales if you have a carry permit. Eliminating carry permits, unless you just want one for travel to reciprocating states. A few more, I can't remember right now.
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

User avatar
bgreenea3
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: SW Michigan

Post by bgreenea3 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:09 pm

Uh oh what will greener do now he doesn't have to buy a gun a month? :wink:
"Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway."

-John Wayne

User avatar
bigfatdave
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 7:22 am
Location: near Camp Perry

Post by bigfatdave » Tue Feb 07, 2012 12:16 pm

The legislators that passed that law should be identified as dangerously stupid.

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 1:42 pm

Good to here the ones that have no impact on the law abiding citizens. Criminals DON'T Care. Texas has been trying to get passed one for Professors and off duty officers too carry. And I think ones who have CC too.

But that will help business that are in your state.
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by ruger22 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 11:22 am

bgreenea3 wrote:Uh oh what will greener do now he doesn't have to buy a gun a month? :wink:
Buy two or three! (but i'm sure only with a darned good "reason")......... :roll:
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

User avatar
bearandoldman
Ye Loquacious Olde Pharte
Ye Loquacious Olde Pharte
Posts: 4194
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:30 am
Location: Mid Michigan

Post by bearandoldman » Thu Feb 09, 2012 12:22 pm

ruger22 wrote:
bgreenea3 wrote:Uh oh what will greener do now he doesn't have to buy a gun a month? :wink:
Buy two or three! (but i'm sure only with a darned good "reason")......... :roll:
I now the Greener and he always has at least one reason if not more.
You have great day and shoot straight and may the Good Lord smile on you.
Image

User avatar
bgreenea3
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1587
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2009 9:35 pm
Location: SW Michigan

Post by bgreenea3 » Thu Feb 09, 2012 5:56 pm

right I always find the reasons too but the funds are sometimes a limiting factor.... (I've got 3 little ones to buy toys and bikes and stuff for!)
"Courage is being scared to death... and saddling up anyway."

-John Wayne

greener

Post by greener » Sun Feb 19, 2012 3:41 pm

bgreenea3 wrote:Uh oh what will greener do now he doesn't have to buy a gun a month? :wink:
The governor hasn't signed the bill, yet. I haven't told your mom that I might not be required to buy one per month.

The Richmond Times Disgrace reported a poll in today's paper showing 66% of those polled opposed getting rid of the statute. I guess the anti-gunner's have done a much better job of advertising than the pro gun folks. The pro gunners may have done a much better job of convincing the pols that we vote.

The pro-gun folks are opposing both versions of Castle bills because they reduce rights under common law.

Post Reply