Brass vs Nickel (38 Spl)

A section to discuss marksmanship issues: techniques, equipment, experiences, etc.

Also, a place to ask marksmanship related questions to seek information from the vast knowledge base of this forum's membership.

Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
bebloomster
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:06 pm
Location: Hi Desert, Ca

Brass vs Nickel (38 Spl)

Post by bebloomster » Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:40 am

Any preference for your "match" loads? Personally I've been using Federal brass (not nickel) for my S&W Model 52-2 mostly because I have an adequate quantity of them. Received an e-mail though that suggested Remington Nickel is generally pretty uniform and has thinner walls than a lot of the other headstamps... creates a more uniform bullet release. Any thoughts?
A day without sunshine is like..... night.

User avatar
blue68f100
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1997
Joined: Mon May 25, 2009 10:31 pm
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas

Post by blue68f100 » Wed Jun 23, 2010 8:33 am

I have used Ni brass in my 357 Mag since I have owned my Python, same brass is now 30+ yrs old. Ni brass is suppose to be a little harder on your sizing die over brass due to the hard surface. I like Ni mainly because it does not tarnish, and you do not need to tumble it. In my other calibers Ni Brass indicates a different load or match grade load. So it pretty easy know what I'm picking up. I have seen a big difference in my die bought 30+yrs ago vs my newer one Hornady Dies. The Hornady bullet expander die is design to give you even tension all the way down. My 30+ yr die only expand the mouth to start the bullet. So I would say it's more on the dies your using vs the brass. All brass has to meed the same spec whether it's Ni or Br.
David

SS MKIII 6 7/8" Fluted Hunter. Mueller Quick Shot, Bushnell 2x Scope, Hogue Rubber Grips
Custom Built 1911

User avatar
bebloomster
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:06 pm
Location: Hi Desert, Ca

Post by bebloomster » Wed Jun 23, 2010 10:47 pm

Oops.... just heard from those that were talking about the Remington Nickel cases. What they were actually saying was that the R-P Nickel cases have a tendency to split at the case mouth before others due to being fairly thin. Not at all what I would be looking for.
A day without sunshine is like..... night.

User avatar
Bullseye
Site Admin/Host
Site Admin/Host
Posts: 6382
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 12:23 pm
Location: USA

Post by Bullseye » Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:02 am

The case mouth splitting happens because the Ni case is harder metal and doesn't take the expanding and crimping process as well as the brass cases.

If your using carbide sizing dies then you don't have as much to be concerned with using the nickle cases. A standard die will show wear fairly quickly, especially if you don't lubricate the cases well before resizing.

R,
Bullseye
Image

User avatar
bebloomster
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 104
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:06 pm
Location: Hi Desert, Ca

Post by bebloomster » Thu Jun 24, 2010 10:15 am

My understanding is that cartridge cases generally do not need to be lubricated if using carbide dies. That's the main reason that I use carbide dies whenever possible. I also have been using brass cases exclusively as I've noted more effort is required to run a Nickel case through the same dies. I seriously doubt that I would ever wear out a carbide die in my lifetime even with Nickel cases though.

Will just continue to use only FEDERAL brass cases for use in my S&W Model 52-2 and any other headstamps in my K-38.
A day without sunshine is like..... night.

Post Reply