Just use the cost of your tools to justify other builds after this one
I wouldn't not recommend LB, but I also am definitely not a LB fanboi. Really depends on what you want out of the pistol.
My LB is a NM Hardball I got for CMP and it shoots 10 shot sub 3" groups at 50 yards with ball, I have not ever seen a stock STI or Kimber come close to that at all. STI guns are generally not for the same application as LB though, STI generally being used for IPSC and USPSA, LB generally being used for bullseye/CMP or a show gun (that being said, STI are still often much more expensive than LB). I don't think Kimber and LB are even comparable in most senses; a Kimber is basically like a Springfield armory gun with more bells and whistles.
Ed Brown and Wilson combat are a little bit of a different story. I have seen some EBs and WCs come close to the accuracy of my LB. EBs and WCs are generally more expensive than LBs too.
Even knowing that my LB is significantly better for what I purchased it for than the above guns, I am somewhat extremely dissatisfied with it. The bushing bore in the slide of my LB was drilled at slight lateral angle, so the barrel bushing does not fit flush, it is canted. The bushing can be pushed flushed, but after the action is cycled it goes back to the canted position. I made a post on GTO years ago regarding the issue and Bullseye spent a lot of time setting my concerns at ease, and I also contacted LB and they said it would not negatively influence the gun. And even though it has maintained its accuracy, I just do not have confidence in it. At this posting it is irrelevant though because there is no where to compete in bullseye shooting anywhere near where I live. When competing in anything, confidence in self and equipment is critical, just based on that I would need a new pistol if I were ever in a position to seriously compete.
Your build just generally looks better quality than my LB. Your polishing work, grip safety fit, and slide to frame fit look much better.