New Bearcat in the house

Discuss .22 pistols.

Moderators: Bullseye, Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

New Bearcat in the house

Post by ruger22 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:45 am

Got it yesterday. $490 out the door. Fit and finish couldn't be better, except for the anodized ejector housing. The stainless EWK housing should be here tomorrow or next to take care of that. Grips are good looking laminated rosewood. I understand Ruger has went to laminate on all wood grips. I wish Hogue still made for Bearcat.

I would guess trigger pull is between 3 and 4 pounds out of the box, so will probably smooth out to three. Very tight lockup, good indexing, and barrel/cylinder gap between .005 and .006. I got an excellent example. Have parts stash and holsters on the way, too.

It may make it to the range in a week or two...... :D
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

User avatar
Coach1
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 3:09 pm
Location: Apex North Carolina

New SA revolver

Post by Coach1 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:21 pm

It sounds like you did really well. The Bearcat will make a very nice addition to your handgun roster. Keep us posted on your range experiences.
"You can't always get what you want. But if you try sometimes, you just might find, you get what you need." The Rolling Stones

User avatar
ruger22
Master contributor
Master contributor
Posts: 1574
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:35 pm
Location: Virginia

Post by ruger22 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:39 pm

The housing got here unexpected today. Forty eight hours from Ohio ain't bad, Parcel Post even.

True to it's RugerForum posts, it's a good fit and looks better than the anodized factory housing.

I don't understand Ruger doing that. All their other stainless SA revolvers have stainless ejector housings. Ruger switched the Bearcats to aluminum in 1963, after five years of steel. The black finish aluminum is as much of a mis-match to blued as the silver anodize on stainless. Either way, it's a machined part, how much more would blued steel and stainless cost for much better guns?
* 2 Ruger Bearcat stainless, w/ EWK ejector housings & Wolff springs
* Ruger SP-101 .22LR, w/ Wolff springs
* 2 NAA Guardian .32ACP
* 3 Zastava M70 .32ACP
* S&W 15-22 Sport (.22LR AR)
* 2 Ruger SR22 .22LR pistols

radio
Regular contributor
Regular contributor
Posts: 108
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:13 pm

Post by radio » Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:19 pm

Apparently every penny saved in manufacturing means the world to Ruger. I kinda wish they'd just go up a dollar or 2 instead of skimp on the details. The 10/22, for example, just gets a little cheaper made every year or so. Silver painted receivers and plastic parts--where do we go next?

The Bearcat, however, is still a jam-up gun. It's on my bucket list for sure. Congrats on yours.

Post Reply